Stephen F Austin to none, 12-01-1836 [approx]
Summary: Draft of Proclamation against Slave Trade.
[About December 1, 1836.]
Whereas the 9th section of the Constitution of Texas prohibits the
"importation or admission of Africans or negroes into this republic except
from the U. S. of A." which article was published and promulgated to the
world by the proclamation of David G. Burnet president ad interim of thisEmpresario or State Agent, he was also recognized as the
agent of the Nashville Company, and subject to their instructions. Thus
all doubts and embarrassments were removed, and the matter was placed
on the most favorable footing for the company for they were permitted to
go on with the contract with foreigners living out of the country. On that
occasion I did all I could to serve the Nashville Company, and saved the
contract of Leftwich from being forfeited by his transfer of it to the
company.
It is a fact well known that in six years nothing was done by this
company to settle the Colony, except to send an agent to explore it, and make
locations for persons who were not in the country. The plan was adopted
of selling land scrip in the U. S. a measure that was pernicious to the best
interests of Texas.
It is a fact well known to me, and to all others who understand this
subject, that the sale of Texas lands by means of scrip in the U. S. and the
imprudent advertisements and publications made in that country by the
agents of companies and Empresarios, caused the first great alarm in
Mexico as to Texas, and produced the prohibition of emigration from the
U. S, by the 11th Article of the Law of
Some time in
After this difficulty was all arranged and quieted I went to Saltillo to
attend the Legislature of which I was a member. Immediately on my ar-
My application in favor of Robinson [Robertson] displeased Governor
Viesca and the Secretary of State, Valle, very much, and produced
considerable irritation against me for even having made such an application,
because they said I knew that it would be an open and direct violation of
the 11th Article of the national law of the
A majority of the then State Legislature were of the central party and
politics, and unfriendly to the progress of Texas, and especially to
Americans. The fact is that by interfering in favor of Robinson [Robertson] at
all, in the matter of parties and politics, I lost sight of my duty to Texas
as its representative, for that duty required that I should retain as much
influence with the Governor as possible and avoid creating excitements. I
knew that applications had been made to the State Government for
Contracts to Colonize the sections of country formerly contracted to Leftwich,
whose contract would expire on the
The Governor expressed a disposition to give those applications the
preference, as they were made by Europeans, and consequently would not
interfere with the prohibitory law of
This was truly alarming and would have been pernicious to the best
interests of Texas. It is well known that nothing but injury to this
country has resulted from the companies who have had colonization contracts
in Texas. They have uniformly made it a matter of illegal speculation by
selling "Land Scrip" and deceiving the ignorant and credulous in foreign
countries. The credit of Texas and all faith in any of our land titles has
been destroyed in the U. S. by such proceedings, and emigration has been
retarded rather than promoted by them. Besides this, it was very evident
that the upper Colony, if granted to a foreign Company, would be again
hung up for six years, as it had been by the Nashville Company, and thus
have left the settlers in my Colonies below, exposed to the Indians; and
what would have been still worse, that nothing but anarchy and perhaps
civil war would have been produced within the limits of my old colonies,
if a Foreign Empresario or Company were permitted to have anything to
do with the distribution of the vacant land remaining there. A single
remark will be sufficient to bring this matter home to the understanding and
feelings of everyone who has any interest in this subject. If at this time
some of our own citizens advocate the montsrous doctrine that all titles
are void and the land vacant, where each and all of the conditions and
minute formalities of the Colonization Laws have not been complied with
by the Settler: What could have been expected from a foreign Empresario
or Company whose only object would have been speculation and to have
had as much land forfeited as possible?
Under these circumstances it was a solemn and paramount duty in me
to keep the land business within, and adjoining my Colonies, as much under
my own control as was possible. I should have failed in my obligations
to the Settlers if I had not done it, and should have merited censure from
them, and yet it seems that I have been, and am abused because I did do it.
Another consideratoin of great importance to Texas influenced me.
Governor Jose M. Viesca was, and uniformly had been friendly to Texas and
to its settlement by Americans. His term of office was to expire on the
I have performed many services to the people of my Colonies and to Texas in general, and I consider that few of them was of more essential and vital importance, than this one of procuring this colonization contract, and keeping off the foreign companies.
The above is a correct statement of facts, so far as I have had anything to do in person with these transactions.
As to the acts of others performed during my absence from the country, or without my knowledge, I have nothing to do with them, and am not responsible for them.
I have been compelled to rely principally on my own recollection in making the foregoing statements many of which are only sustained by my own word. My unofficial correspondence with Genl. Teran, the Governor of the State, the Political Chief of Bexar, and others would prove the most of them, but my private papers were scattered, and many of them destroyed, during the invasion, and I have not yet collected and arranged the fragments that have been saved. These matters were however so notorious at the time they occurred that several persons were acquainted with them.
I therefore assert positively that so far from having injured or attempted to injure the Nashville Company, or Robinson [Robertson] I have uniformly endeavored to serve them, and have served them more than any other man living, in the most critical times, and even at the hazard of injuring myself and jeopardizing the best interests of Texas.
When I was in Nashville them, in not settling the Colony
as they might have done from
Ever since
As I observed in the commencement this statement is made to correct many misrepresentations and erroneous impressions that have been circulated, in relation to these transactions, by which much confusion has been produced in the public mind and great injustice done to me. This exposition may also be of service in elucidating the question now before Congress, as to what ought to be done with Robinson's [Robertson's] Colony. I therefore beg that you will lay it before the Senate. I have the honor to remain,